Lee v. Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Clark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1702

REGINALD LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN CLARK; JOHN DOE, JR.; RICHARD ROE, Officer, in their individual and official capacities; BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT; THEO FLEET, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARTIN O’MALLEY; DOUGLAS L. PATTERSON; BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL; CITY OF BALTIMORE; SHEILA DIXON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00897-WDQ)

Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Stakem Hornig, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan, William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lee appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Clark,

No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished