U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

In Re: Feurtado v.

In Re: Feurtado v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 7, 2008

In Re: Feurtado v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7548

In Re: ANTHONY FEURTADO, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:96-cr-00325-SB; 3:03-cv-02949-SB)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 7, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Feurtado, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Anthony Feurtado petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) filed on August 2, 2006, and amended on August 14, 2006, and his motion to correct clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court has now ruled on both motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.