Roger Dale Charles, II, appeals the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a motion to compel his attorney to produce a full copy of the record and denying it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Charles, No. 2:04-cr-00027 (W.D. N.C. Sept. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.