Lamb v. Astrue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 3, 2008

Lamb v. Astrue, 267 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust the required administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Lamb v. Astrue, No. 4:07-cv-00021-RBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

To the extent we may properly consider Lamb's constitutional challenge to the statutory and regulatory provisions setting a limit on insured status for disability insurance claimants, we find the claim meritless.

Reference

Full Case Name: Robert Emerson LAMB, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee
Status: Unpublished