Howard v. Pettiford
Opinion
Kevin Howard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Pettiford, No. 9:07-cv-00887-RBH, 2007 WL 3119441 (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Kevin HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dean Williams, Plaintiff, v. Warden M. PETTIFORD; Lieutenant Shawnce, Lieutenant SIS at FCI-Bennettsville; Lieutenant Miller, Lieutenant at FCI-Bennettsville; Doctor Rince, Doctor and Head Psychologist at FCI-Bennettsville; Doctor Barrous, Doctor and Medical Director at FCI-Bennettsville; D. Bowens, Captain at FCI-Bennettsville, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished