Riffin v. Wisnom
Opinion
James Riffin appeals a district court order denying as moot his motion for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order, granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Riffin v. Wisnom, No. 1:07-cv-01623 (D.Md. Nov. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James RIFFIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Raymond S. WISNOM, Jr., Code Enforcement Hearing Officer; Baltimore County, Maryland, Department of Permits and Development Management, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished