U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Henson v. Dillman

Henson v. Dillman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2008 · Traxler, Duncan, Hamilton
272 F. App'x 237

Henson v. Dillman

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Henson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henson v. Dillman, No. 3:07-cv-00694-REP (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2007; Jan. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.