Juan Pablo AIvarado-Acosta appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36, which the court construed as a motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. AlvaradoAcosta, No. 4:04-cr-70059-jlk-1 (W.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.