Macklin v. Mirant Services, L.L.C.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Macklin v. Mirant Services, L.L.C.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2370

JAMES MACKLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MIRANT SERVICES, L.L.C.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-555-1)

Submitted: March 13, 2008 Decided: April 8, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy B. Fleming, Keir S. Bickerstaffe, WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal D. Mollen, Carson H. Sullivan, Courtney Mueller, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Macklin appeals from the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mirant

Services, L.L.C., on his Title VII complaint alleging race

discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record

included on appeal and the parties’ briefs and have found no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Macklin v. Mirant Servs., L.L.C., No. CA-

05-555-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 9, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished