Macklin v. Mirant Services, L.L.C.
Macklin v. Mirant Services, L.L.C.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2370
JAMES MACKLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MIRANT SERVICES, L.L.C.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-555-1)
Submitted: March 13, 2008 Decided: April 8, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy B. Fleming, Keir S. Bickerstaffe, WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal D. Mollen, Carson H. Sullivan, Courtney Mueller, PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Macklin appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mirant
Services, L.L.C., on his Title VII complaint alleging race
discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record
included on appeal and the parties’ briefs and have found no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Macklin v. Mirant Servs., L.L.C., No. CA-
05-555-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 9, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished