Doe v. Maldonado

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Doe v. Maldonado, 274 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2008)

Doe v. Maldonado

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ree Ex Doe appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doe v. Mukasey, No. 9:05-cv-03310-SB (D.S.C. May 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ree Ex DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerardo MALDONADO, Jr.; Dennis Hendershott; Tim Byrne; United States Attorney; Michael B. Mukasey, United States Attorney General Agency, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished