Beasley v. Wood
Beasley v. Wood
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7541
MARION BEASLEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D.G. WOOD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00850-NCT)
Submitted: April 3, 2008 Decided: April 24, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marion Beasley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marion Beasley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Beasley v. Wood, No. 1:05-cv-00850-NCT (M.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2007).
Moreover, although not specifically addressed by the district
court, Beasley’s claim under the Religious Land Use and
Institutionalized Persons Act,
Pub. L. No. 106-274, 114Stat. 804,
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a) (2000) (“RLUIPA”), may be dismissed for the
same reasons as his § 1983 claim. See Lovelace v. Lee,
472 F.3d 174, 185-86(4th Cir. 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished