Richard Peamon appeals the district court’s orders granting A & R Development’s motions to set aside an entry of default, for a protective order, and for summary judgment on Peamon’s civil negligence action, which alleged inadequate security at his apartment complex. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Peamon v. A & R Dev. Corp., No. 1:06-cv02974-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2007; Apr. 19, 2007; Feb. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.