Miranda v. University of MD College Park
Miranda v. University of MD College Park
Opinion
Danilo Miranda appeals the district court’s order dismissing his race and national origin discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Miranda v. Univ. of MD, Coll. Park, No. 8:04-cv-02609-AW (D. Md. entered Nov. 20, 2006; filed Nov. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed.
Although Miranda also asserted an age discrimination claim against Defendant under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2000), the district court dismissed that claim by separate order. Miranda does not challenge that order on appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.