United States v. Foxworth
United States v. Foxworth
280 F. App'x 308
United States v. Foxworth
Opinion
Janice Lee Foxworth appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fox-worth, No. 5:00-cr-30016-sgw-l (W.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.