Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. 5:07-cv-00092-F, 2007 WL 3353416 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *286 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.