Hancock v. Brown
Hancock v. Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6662
PRESTON HANCOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00014-HEH)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Preston Hancock appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a consent to the collection of fees form. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hancock v. Brown, No. 3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.