U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Amarasinghe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2008 · Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Michael

282 F. App'x 228

Counsel

Disamodha C. Amarasinghe, Narlie Amarasinghe, Appellants Pro Se. Donald L. Korb, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C.; Teresa Ellen McLaughlin, Patrick J. Urda, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hackenberg v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Disamodha C. Amarasinghe and Narlie Amarasinghe appeal from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a deficiency in the Amarasinghes’ income tax for 2002. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Amara *229 singhe v. Comm’r. of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 06-15883 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.