Kirkwood Cabiness appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to compel and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cabiness, No. 4:02-cr-70031-NKM (W.D.Va. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *111 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.