Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion and denying reconsideration of its May 11, 2004 order granting in part and denying in part his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2007; entered July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.