Hill v. Astrue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hill v. Astrue, 285 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2008)

Hill v. Astrue

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edgar A. Hill appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, jve affirm. Hill v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00032-GMW (W.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We'dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edgar A. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished