U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Patterson

United States v. Patterson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 2008 · Niemeyer, Traxler, Gregory
286 F. App'x 106

Counsel

Kenneth R. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Patterson

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth R. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to file a belated direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Patterson, No. 3:05-cr-00048-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.