Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reopen his 1997 breach of contract action, and his motion to vacate the denial of the motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis *13 trict court. Wilder v. Greidinger, No. 1:97-cv-02283-WDQ (D.Md. Dec. 5, 2007 & Dec. 17, 2007). We deny Wilder’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.