Perkins v. Watson
Opinion
Paulus Irvin Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *599 error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perkins v. Watson, No. 7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu, 2008 WL 816678 (W.D.Va. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Paulus Irvin PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan WATSON, Warden; A.P. Harvey, Assistant Warden; Officer Hensley; A. Kilbourne, Lieutenant; Sergeant Schluboom; Officer Cox; Major J. Combs; Doctor Jones; Ms. Strawberry; P. Scarberry, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished