U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Green v. Philip Morris

Green v. Philip Morris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 28, 2008 · Niemeyer, Traxler, Shedd
290 F. App'x 618

Green v. Philip Morris

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Samuel Green, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Philip Morris, No. 2:03-ev-00157-RGD (E.D. Va. June 18, 2007). We deny Green’s motion to appoint counsel and to “interduct evidence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.