Otubanjo v. Mukasey
Otubanjo v. Mukasey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1099
BABATUNDE BIODUN OTUBANJO, Petitioner, v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 26, 2008 Decided: September 4, 2008
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Francis Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier Hamilton, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Babatunde Biodun Otubanjo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge denying his request for a continuance for adjudication of a petition for alien relative. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the decision to deny a continuance was not an abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.