U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Young

United States v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 23, 2008 · Motz, Traxler, Shedd
294 F. App'x 34

United States v. Young

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or deferment of his fine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 7:04-cr-00050-F-l (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.