United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
294 F. App'x 36
United States v. Williams
Opinion
Randy Gean Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:99-cr-00116-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2008). We grant Williams’ motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the coui’t and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.