U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Oiler

United States v. Oiler
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 23, 2008 · Motz, Traxler, Shedd
294 F. App'x 32

United States v. Oiler

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dorothy Ann Oiler appeals the district court’s order denying her request for re-sentencing, but granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Oiler, No. 5:06-cr-00098-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 7, 2008). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.