United States v. Jackson
United States v. Jackson
294 F. App'x 33
United States v. Jackson
Opinion
Mark Allen Jackson appeals from the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 1:99-cr-00421-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.