United States v. Spotts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Spotts, 295 F. App'x 590 (4th Cir. 2008)
Michael, Motz, Per Curiam, Traxler

United States v. Spotts

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Andre Spotts appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence and related motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spotts, No. 3:98-cr-00047-l (S.D.W.Va. May 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelvin Andre SPOTTS, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished