U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Spotts

United States v. Spotts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 3, 2008 · Michael, Motz, Per Curiam, Traxler
295 F. App'x 590

United States v. Spotts

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Andre Spotts appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence and related motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spotts, No. 3:98-cr-00047-l (S.D.W.Va. May 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.