Becke v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Becke v. Mukasey, 295 F. App'x 556 (4th Cir. 2008)

Becke v. Mukasey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Luma Becke, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its pi’ior order, which denied Becke’s motion to reopen removal proceedings based on changed country conditions in Cameroon. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Becke (B.I.A. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arthur Luma BECKE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished