United States v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6953

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOHN PAUL SMITH,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:02-cr-00064-JPB-7)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Paul Smith appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C.A. § 3582

(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States

v. Smith, No. 3:02-cr-00064-JPB-7 (N.D.W. Va. May 30, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished