United States v. Reed

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Reed

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY EUGENE REED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-3)

Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C.A. § 3582

(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Reed, No. 4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-3

(E.D. Va. July 9 & Aug. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished