Knox v. Graham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Knox v. Graham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6944

TITO LEMONT KNOX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RT. GRAHAM, Officer; DEPT. GARNER, JE 0136,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (9:07-cv-00283-HMH)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON, WALSH, RHENEY & TERRELL, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knox v.

Graham, No. 9:07-cv-00283-HMH (D.S.C. May 27, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished