United States v. Manigault
United States v. Manigault
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6832
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDRE MANIGAULT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA-1)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Manigault, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Andre Manigault appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.* United States v. Manigault, No. 3:95-cr-
00488-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We note a typographical error in the district court’s order on page one in the recitation of Manigault’s advisory guideline calculation. The district court intended to state that Manigault’s base offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines was 38, not 3, for his violation of
21 U.S.C. § 846(2000). This typographical error does not affect, however, the district court’s considered reasoning in denying Manigault’s motion for sentence reduction.
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished