Knox v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Knox v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6870

TITO LEMONT KNOX,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (9:07-cv-01792-HMH)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knox v.

United States, No. 9:07-cv-01792-HMH (D.S.C. May 20, 2008). We

deny Knox’s motion for a formal briefing schedule and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished