Knox v. United States
Knox v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6870
TITO LEMONT KNOX,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (9:07-cv-01792-HMH)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2000) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knox v.
United States, No. 9:07-cv-01792-HMH (D.S.C. May 20, 2008). We
deny Knox’s motion for a formal briefing schedule and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished