Bazzie v. Eastern Associated Coal Corporation
Opinion
Malcolm L. Bazzie seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of Bazzie’s petition for modification of a decision that denied black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers *237 ible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for the reasons stated by the Board. See Bazzie v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp., No. 07-0357-BLA (B.R.B. Jan. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Malcolm L. BAZZIE, Petitioner, v. EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents
- Status
- Unpublished