U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Sutton v. North Carolina Dept of Labor

Sutton v. North Carolina Dept of Labor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 4, 2008

Sutton v. North Carolina Dept of Labor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1380

SYDNEY CHERYL SUTTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cv-00308-FL)

Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, MONTEITH & RICE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sydney Cheryl Sutton appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment on her retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-85 (2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep’t of Labor, No. 5:06-cv-00308-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered March 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.