United States v. Kollock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kollock

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6761

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CORNELIUS KOLLOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:00-cr-00158-WO-1)

Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cornelius Kollock, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Kollock appeals a district court order

denying his motion under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) seeking a

reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed the district

court’s order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by

the district court. See United States v. Kollock, No. 1:00-cr-

00158-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2008). We deny Kollock’s motion

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished