Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland
Richardson v. The Great State of Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1802
EARL L. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE GREAT STATE OF MARYLAND; CECIL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICE; NICHOLAS RICCIUTI, Director of Cecil County Department of Social Services; WILLIAMS JONES, Employee of Department of Social Services; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; MRS. GULOTTI, Elkton Maryland Branch; MRS. DAVIDS, Elkton Maryland Branch; THE GREAT STATE OF WASHINGTON; CLALLAM COUNTY WASHINGTON; JIM JONES, Administrator; LINDA CLEVENGER, Administrator; DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01087-CCB)
Submitted: October 27, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl L. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, William Ferris Brockman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark C. Jobson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, Olympia, Washington; Kelly Hughes Iverson, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Earl L. Richardson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action complaining about the termination of
social security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Richardson v. The Great State of
Maryland, No. 1:08-cv-01087-CCB (D. Md. July 2, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished