Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1668

PAUL YONGO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; CAROL MARTIN; RHONDA HOGGE, AIC; NATIONWIDE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; NATIONWIDE LOSS ADJUSTERS; SHARRON STEPHEN-HENLEY; ARTHUR WALTER; NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; J. CATER GLASS; HAROLD C. RHUDY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

LATONYA MICHELE MCNEIL,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00094-D)

Submitted: October 8, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee Simpson, III, LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE L. SIMPSON, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E. Thompson, III, BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGGS & THOMPSON, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing

his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and

denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Yongo v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 5:07-cv-00094-D

(E.D.N.C. May 16, 2008; May 27, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished