Biaka v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Biaka v. Mukasey, 299 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2008)

Biaka v. Mukasey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gustave D. Biaka, a native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider, which the Board construed as his third motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Biaka (B.I.A. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gustave D. BIAKA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished