United States v. Golson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Golson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:01-cr-00047-RGD-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals a district court order

denying his motion filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(2006).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and

find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Golson, No. 2:01-cr-

00047-RGD (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished