United States v. Fuller
United States v. Fuller
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7246
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DARYL ANDRE FULLER,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1)
Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryl Andre Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daryl Andre Fuller appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Fuller,
No. 7:98-cr-00076-HMH-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished