Richardson v. Sisk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Sisk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6050

GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JAMES SISK, Manager/Compute; GENE JOHNSON, Director; ROBERT MCDONALD, Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendants – Appellees.

No. 08-6769

GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JAMES SISK, Manager/Compute; GENE JOHNSON, Director; ROBERT MCDONALD, Attorney General; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00488-REP)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) for failure to pay his filing fee, and the

order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). We have reviewed the orders and record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Richardson v. Sisk, No. 3:07-cv-

00488-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007; Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished