United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6410
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE LAMONT SMITH, a/k/a Blue, a/k/a Tyrone Eady,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-jpj-1)
Submitted: November 5, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Smith argues that the district court erred by
failing to reduce his sentence under Amendment 706 of the
Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”)
§ 2D1.1(c) (2007 & Supp. 2008); USSG App. C, Amend. 706. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Smith, No. 3:94-cr-00041-jpj-1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished