United States v. Jupiter
United States v. Jupiter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6846
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE SHELDON JUPITER, a/k/a Star,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1)
Submitted: October 28, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court=s
orders denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), and his motion for reconsideration of that
denial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error
in the district court’s denial of Jupiter’s motion under Amendment
706 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines for a two-level offense level
reduction because such a reduction would not reduce his Guidelines
sentencing range. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Jupiter, No.
5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. May 8, 2008; June 13, 2008). * We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Jupiter may file a new § 3582(c) motion seeking a four-level reduction based on Amendments 505 and 706 to the Guidelines. We, of course, offer no opinion on what the disposition of such a motion should be.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished