United States v. Knox

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Knox

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6982

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DON EDDLON KNOX, a/k/a D,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00262-RLW-11)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Eddlon Knox, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Don Eddlon Knox appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Knox, No. 3:97-cr-

00262-RLW-11 (E.D. Va. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished