Penland v. County of Spartanburg
Penland v. County of Spartanburg
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1925
CHARLES W. PENLAND, Sr.; MARY PENLAND, Wife,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver; RMC OFFICE OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:07-cv-03288-HMH)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland appeal the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing their
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Penland v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:07-
cv-03288-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished