Hall v. North Carolina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hall v. North Carolina

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1726

DARLENE LACKEY HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA, State of; ALEXANDER COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; RICHARD TALBERT HALL; RICKY MINTON; SARA ELIZABETH MECIMORE; WESTERN PIEDMONT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS; ALEXANDER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; CLEDA GRAHAM; STEVEN J. JOLLY; DEBORAH B. JOLLY; CALDWELL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00048-RLV)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darlene Lackey Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darlene Lackey Hall appeals the district court’s order

summarily dismissing her complaint pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2000) for failure to state a claim, for lack of

jurisdiction, and as frivolous. In her informal appellate

brief, Hall failed to challenge the district court's reasons

supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, Hall has waived

appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The

Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished