Hall v. North Carolina
Hall v. North Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1726
DARLENE LACKEY HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA, State of; ALEXANDER COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; RICHARD TALBERT HALL; RICKY MINTON; SARA ELIZABETH MECIMORE; WESTERN PIEDMONT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS; ALEXANDER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; CLEDA GRAHAM; STEVEN J. JOLLY; DEBORAH B. JOLLY; CALDWELL COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00048-RLV)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darlene Lackey Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Darlene Lackey Hall appeals the district court’s order
summarily dismissing her complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) for failure to state a claim, for lack of
jurisdiction, and as frivolous. In her informal appellate
brief, Hall failed to challenge the district court's reasons
supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, Hall has waived
appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The
Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished